Jason Gorman is an interesting guy, and has a lot to say. I agree with lots of it, especially his iconoclastic position on agilism. This time, I’d like to disagree with two paragraphs in a recent blog entry. The second one first. But I suspect in 5-10 years’ time, as test-driven development becomes more popular and teams become more ambitious in their testing efforts, test developers will be in great … Read more
Here’s a heuristic: when someone is describing (or, especially, dissing) some practice or methodology, don’t bother taking them seriously unless they know the difference between tenants and tenets. Examples abound.
Over the last few months, I’ve been wrestling with a book called Sensemaking in Organizations, by Karl Weick. I’ve got bogged down in it from time to time, but it’s fascinating. Weick describes sensemaking as having seven properties: it’s grounded in constructing or enhancing the identity of an individual or group; it’s retrospective, or based on “meaningful lived experience”; it’s “enactive of sensible environments”, which is kind of circular; it … Read more
I know little of Sir Geoffrey Vickers, but I read a quote recently that made me want to find out more. In Play as Exploratory Learning, by Mary Reilly, he is quoted as saying, In these days when the rich in knowledge eat such specialized food at such separate tables, only the dogs have a chance of a balanced diet. That’s a gorgeous reminder about interdisciplinary thinking. And that reminds … Read more
This year’s Conference for the Association for Software Testing will be held in Toronto, Ontario, July 14-16, 2008. Jerry Weinberg is our first announced keynote speaker, with others to come. The theme of the conference is “Beyond the Boundaries: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Software Testing”. CAST is a different kind of conference. It is, to a great degree, a scaled-up version of the LAWST-style workshops initiated by Cem Kaner and Brian … Read more
A couple of people, both SDETs at Microsoft, have responded either to Joel Spolsky’s post on SDET culture at Microsoft or to my excerpt of it in a recent blog post of usefulness in software. Those people deserve a response. The first issue is that they’ve taken Joel to task for promulgating rumours. But these are rumours in the same sense that the cell theory and the theory of natural … Read more
I’ve just had to buy a new computer, and am now becoming intimate with Windows Vista. “Becoming intimate” is a euphemism that people sometimes use when they mean “being screwed”. The biggest problem I’ve encountered so far is with Vista’s User Interface Feature Concealment module, which took the few remaining things that were reasonably intuitive and accessible in Windows XP and hid them. Joel Spolsky, he of Joel on Software, … Read more
Much of what I’ve reported about EuroSTAR has been on the topic that had the most energy around it–the very gratifying response to my keynote presentation. I’d be remiss in not mentioning some other highlights. A tip of the hat to Tracy O’Connell and the friendly, helpful, and capable staff of EuroSTAR 2007. The entire conference went off splendidly. Henrik Andersson, a member of the context-driven community and a real … Read more
For those who read my blog but don’t read Grig Georghiu‘s, he notes an interview with Jerry Weinberg here. Thanks, Grig.
One of the problems in our business is that people are usually reluctant to talk about testing, even when it’s successful. In order to discuss testing, they may have to cop to problems in their product, or in their development work. Even if they’re very happy with the things that they’ve learned in the course and put into practice, they may have to acknowledge that earlier forms of testing were … Read more